Are all cyclic groups abelian?
Are all cyclic groups inherently abelian in nature? It's a question that delves into the heart of group theory, specifically examining the relationship between cyclicity and commutativity within groups. Could it be that the very definition of a cyclic group, as one generated by a single element, inherently implies that any two elements within it can be rearranged without altering the result of their operation? Or is there a subtle distinction between these two concepts that prevents us from making such a blanket statement? Let's delve deeper into the matter and explore the intricacies of cyclic groups and their relationship with abelian groups.